Science Creativity Assessment Instruments in the Merdeka Curriculum in Elementary Schools
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30736/atl.v8i2.2062Keywords:
Assessment, Elementary school, Creative thinking, Merdeka curriculum, ScienceAbstract
This research is motivated by the alignment between the learning objectives of Natural Sciences (IPA) and the Merdeka curriculum, one of which is to develop student creativity. Therefore, it is necessary to prepare an assessment instrument that can measure student creativity, including creative thinking skills. This research aims to determine whether the assessment instrument to measure creative thinking skills is feasible to use or not. In this research, the approach employed is Research and Development (R&D). The development research method follows the Borg and Gall model. The data collection method uses a questionnaire that is given to validators. The validation sheet is the instrument used. Content validity is the method used for data analysis. The test instrument's validity was high, with Aiken's V score of 0.82, surpassing the 0.800 threshold for high validity. This makes the instrument reliable for assessing students' creative thinking skills. It is suitable for use in elementary schools to evaluate higher-order thinking and creativity. The implications are that the instrument can be applied in elementary schools to assess student learning outcomes at the level of higher-order thinking skills, particularly related to creativity. Guildford's indicators—Fluency, Flexibility, Originality, Elaboration, and Redefinition—offer a comprehensive creativity assessment. Fluency (3 questions) measures idea quantity. Flexibility (2 questions) assesses adaptability to different perspectives. Originality (5 questions) evaluates the uniqueness of ideas. Elaboration (3 questions) examines idea detail. Redefinition (2 questions) measures perspective shifts. All questions are valid, ensuring accurate and thorough creativity evaluation.
Downloads
References
Abidin, Y. (2016). Revitalisasi Penilaian Pembelajaran dalam Konteks Pendidikan Multiliterasi Abad Ke-21. Bandung: Refika Aditama.
Akbar, S. (2013). Instrumen Perangkat Pembelajaran. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Astawan, I., Suarjana, I., Werang, B., Asaloei, S., Sinaturi, M., & Elele, E. (2023). STEM-Based Scientific Learning and its Impact on Students’ Critical and Creative Thinking Skills: An Empirical Study. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 12(3), 482-492. doi:https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v12i3
Astuti, Waluya, S. B., & Asikin, M. (2020). Instrumen Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Matematika untuk Siswa Kelas IV Sekolah Dasar. Musamus Journal of Primary Education, 3(1), 27-34. doi:https://doi.org/10.35724/musjpe.v3i1.3117
Bali, E. N. (2023, Agustus). Pengelolaan Asesmen dalam Kurikulum Merdeka pada Sekolah Penggerakdi Kabupaten Sumba Timur NTT. Jurnal Masyarakat Mandiri, 7(4), 3030-3041. doi:https://doi.org/10.31764/jmm.v7i4.15183
Dwikoranto, Munasir, Setiani, R., Suyitno, Surasmi, W. A., Tresnaningsih, S., & Pramonoadi. (2020). Effectiveness of Project Based Laboratory Learning to Increase Student’s Science Process Skills and Creativity. Seminar Nasional Fisika IOP Conf. Series: Journal of Physics: Conf. Series 1491 (pp. 1-12). Surabaya: Universitas Negeri Surabaya. doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1491/1/012006
Ernawati, M. D., Muhammad, D., Asrial, A., & Muhaimin, M. (2019). Identifying Creative Thinking Skills in Subject Matter Bio-Chemistry. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 8(4), 581-589. doi: https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v8i4.20257
Faresta, R. A., Anggara, W., Mandiri, T. A., & Septiawan, A. (2020). Pengembangan Instrumen Tes Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Berbasis Pendekatan Konflik Kognitif. Jurnal Pendidikan, Sains, Geologi dan Geofisika, 1(2), 39-42. doi:https://doi.org/10.29303/goescienceedu.v1i2.55
Greenier , V., Fathi, J., & Behzadpoor, S. F. (2023). Teaching For Creativity in an EFL Context: The Predictive Roles of School Climate, Teaching Enthusiasm, and Metacognition. Science Direct, 50, 101419. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101419
Guilford, j. (1967). The Nature of Human Intelligence. New York: mcgraw-hill.
Guilford, J. (1973). Fundamental Statistics in Psychology and Education. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
Herpiana, R., & Rosidin, U. (2018). Development of Instrument for Assessing Students’ Critical and Creative Thinking Ability. Journal of Physics: Conference Series (1st International Conference of Education on Sciences, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (ICE-STEM)). 948, pp. 1-6. Jakarta: under license by IOP Publishing Ltd. doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/948/1/012054
Istiyono, E. (2020). Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian dan Analisis Hasil Belajar Fisika. Yogyakarta: UNY Press.
Mahfud. (2013). Berpikir dalam Belajar; Membentuk Karakter Kreatif Peserta Didik. Jurnal At Tarbawi Al Haditsah, 1-26. Retrieved from https://www.jurnal.syekhnurjati.ac.id/index.php/tarbawi/article/view/1229
Mashitoh, N. L. (2021). Creative Thinking Ability Based on Self Efficacy on an Independent Learning Through Google Classroom Support. Journal of Primary Education, 10(1), 79–88. doi:https://doi.org/10.15294/JPE.V10I1.45248
Munandar, U. (2012). Pengembangan Kreativitas Anak Berbakat. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Musdi, E., As’ari, A. R., Harisman, Y., Syaputra, H., & Hevardani, K. A. (2024). Student’s Creative Thinking Based on Study Level, Learning Style, Gender, and Combination of the Three. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 13(3), 1591~1601. doi: https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v13i3.27936
Purnawanto, A. T. (2020). Perencanaan Pembelajaran Bermakna dan Asesmen Kurikulum Merdeka. Jurnal Pedagogy, 15(1), 75–94. Retrieved from http://www.jurnal.staimuhblora.ac.id/index.php/pedagogy/article/view/116
Saido, G. S.-A. (2015). Teaching Strategies for Promoting Higher Order Thinking Skills: A Case of Secondary Science Teachers. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Management, 3(4), 16–30. Retrieved from https://ejournal.um.edu.my/index.php/MOJEM/article/view/6077
Saraswati, D., Wahidmurni, & Zuhriyah, I. A. (2023). Pembelajaran Tematik Berbasis Multiple Intelligences dalam Mengembangkan Kreativitas Siswa di SD Plus Al-Kautsar Malang. At-Thullab: Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Madrasah Ibtidaiyah, 7(1), 1-17. doi:https://doi.org/10.30736/atl.v7i1.1147
Sartika, A. D., Cindika, P. A., Bella, B. S., Anggraini, L. I., Wulandari, P., & Indayana, E. (2023). Implementasi Kurikulum Merdeka Belajar Menggunakan Model Pembelajaran Interaktif pada Mata Pelajaran IPAS SD/MI. Journal of Development and Research in Education, 3(2), 51-65. Retrieved from https://www.ejournal.khairulazzam.org/index.php/journey/article/view/73
Setiani, R., Sanjaya, I. G., & Jatmiko, B. (2019). ARICESA is an Alternative Learning Model to Improve Learning Motivation and Understanding of Student Concepts. International Journal of Instruction, 12(2), 383-398. doi:https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12225a
Slameto. (2010). Belajar dan Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhi. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Starko, A. (2010). Creativity in the Classroom: Schools of Curious Delight. New York: Routledge.
Suarti, N. W. (2022). Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Tematik berbasis HOTS untuk Peserta Didik Kelas IV Sekolah Dasar. Indonesian Journal of Educational Development, 2(4), 534-548. doi: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6178829
Suciati, S., Silvita, S., Prasetyo, O., Fauziah, M., Santika, K., Norawi, A., & Rahman, H. (2023). Problem-Based Learning Models: Their Effectiveness in Improving Creative Thinking Skills of Students with Different Academic Skills in Science Learning. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 12(4), 672-683. doi: https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v12i4.44752
Suhardi, I., & Budiyaningsih, H. E. (2022). Validasi Pakar Konten pada Pengembangan Paket Soal Bahasa Indonesia untuk Basis Data Computer Based Testing. Jurnal MediaTIK : Jurnal Media Pendidikan Teknik Informatika dan Komputer, 5(2), 38-42. doi:https://doi.org/10.26858/jmtik.v5i2.33784
Suwandani, R. A. (2020). Analisis Faktor-Faktor Kesulitan Guru dalam Melaksanakan Penilaian Autentik di SDN Gugus 1 Kecamatan Janapria. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Indonesia (JIPI), 2(1), 24-30. Retrieved from https://jipi.unram.ac.id/index.php/jipi/article/view/46/31
Tangkin, W. P. (2019). Pemanfaatan Rubrik Sebagai Instrumen Penilaian Alternatif. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 9(1), 29-39. doi:https://doi.org/10.24246/j.js.2019.v9.i1.p29-39
Tridaya, T. I. (2012). Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Siswa dengan Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 1(1), 22-26. Retrieved from http://ejournal.unp.ac.id/students/index.php/pmat/article/view/1152/844
Xu, S., Reiss, M. J., & Lodge, W. (2024). Comprehensive Scientific Creativity Assessment (C SCA): A New Approach for Measuring Scientific Creativity in Secondary School Students. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 1-27. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-024-10469-z
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Rahyu Setiani, Rohmatus Syafi'ah, Setyo Hartanto, Ela Rolita Arifianti and Dwikoranto
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
The journal allow the authors to hold the copyright without restrictions and allow the authors to retain publishing rights without restrictions. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
The journal allows third parties (readers, researchers, and others) to share and adapt the material in line with the license. In addition, the material must be given appropriate credit, provided with a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. If authors remix, transform, or build upon the material, they must distribute their contributions under the same license as the original.
