A Textual Analysis of Cohesion and Coherence in the Background Sections of Theses by Preservice Madrasah Ibtidaiyah Teachers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30736/atl.v9i2.2562Keywords:
Academic writing, background theses, coherence, cohesion, preservice Madrasah Ibtidaiyah teachersAbstract
This study examines the coherence and cohesion aspects of the background sections of theses written by preservice Madrasah Ibtidaiyah teachers. Using a descriptive qualitative approach, five theses were purposively selected from official university repositories. Analysis was conducted using a discourse framework of cohesion and coherence to examine how students structured and connected ideas in their writing. The results indicate that students are good at using cohesive devices, particularly conjunctions and anaphoric references. However, substitution and ellipsis are rarely used, resulting in suboptimal language efficiency. In terms of coherence, most texts have a logical flow; however, the connections between ideas are weak, and the development of ideas is often uneven. These findings suggest that although students possess basic competencies in academic writing, they still require more focused instruction on rhetorical style and text organization. This study has practical implications for improving academic writing pedagogy and curriculum development in teacher education programs, particularly in the context of Islamic higher education.
Downloads
References
Abalkheel, A., Sourani, M., & ElZohbi, S. (2025). Phonological Orchestration and Structural Unity: The Dual Role of the Fawasil. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 7(3), 597–610. https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i3.8484
Alturki, M. M. (2025). The Translation of Repetition in Arabic Religious Discourse Into English: The Case of the Quran. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 15(7), 2239–2247. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1507.16
Azmi, W. (2021). Penanda Kohesi Gramatikal dalam Latar Belakang Skripsi Mahasiswa Universitas Negeri Padang. LINGUA: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Pengajarannya, 18(2), 261–271. https://doi.org/10.30957/lingua.v18i2.715
Barbecho, E. T., Gorro, K. D., Comeros, J. S., & Capuno, G. R. J. (2025). Linguistic features of the writing competence of the alternative learning system students. Journal of Education and Learning, 19(4), 2128–2138. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v19i4.22862
Bi, P. (2025). Longitudinal Development of L2 Writing Cohesion in Continuation Tasks. International Journal of Applied Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12840
Buzzacchi, C. (2025). Differentiated Autonomy and Its Unknowns. Quaderni Costituzionali, 45(2), 281–312. https://doi.org/10.1439/117351
Cuba-Raime, C., Torres-Orihuela, G., del Carpio, C. C., & Mendoza, N. O. (2025). Use of Discourse Markers in Master’s Theses of Linguistics at a Peruvian University. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 15(7), 2104–2113. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1507.02
Du, Z., & Hashimoto, K. (2025). AcademiCraft: Transforming Writing Assistance for English for Academic Purposes with Multi-Agent System Innovations. Information (Switzerland), 16(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/info16040254
Eggins, S. (2004). Introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistics: 2nd Edition. An Introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistics.
Emilia, E., Habibi, N., & Bangga, L. A. (2018). An analysis of cohesion of exposition texts: An Indonesian context. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7(3), 515–523. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v7i3.9791
Golparvar, S. E., Hu, G., & Seyedi, S. E. (2025). Cohesion in the discussion section of research articles: A cross-disciplinary investigation. English for Specific Purposes, 77, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2024.08.004
Halliday, M. A. K., & Hassan, R. (2014). Cohesion in English.
Hill-Madsen, A. (2025). Coherence in popularized medico-pharmaceutical reports: The case of EPAR summaries for the public. Revista de Lenguas para Fines Específicos, 31, 31–61. https://doi.org/10.20420/rlfe/2025.781
Inayah, N., Afra, A., Azmar, C. N., & Yaqin, L. N. (2024a). A linguistic analysis of grammatical cohesion devices in discussion sections of undergraduate theses. International Journal of Language Studies, 18(4), 149–166. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13956443
Inayah, N., Afra, A., Azmar, C. N., & Yaqin, L. N. (2024b). A linguistic analysis of grammatical cohesion devices in discussion sections of undergraduate theses. International Journal of Language Studies, 18(4), 149–166. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13956443
Keivan, M., Jalilifar, A., & Izadi, A. (2025). Uncovering global cohesion patterns in the introductory sections of Applied Linguistics research articles. Journal of English for Research Publication Purposes, 6(1), 37–65. https://doi.org/10.1075/jerpp.25008.jal
Miles, & Huberman. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis.
Okrah, K. E., Owusu, E., Sarfo-Adu, K., Adade-Yeboah, A., Appiah, P., & Anane, O. S. (2025). Discourse Markers In Focus: Students’ Application Of Transitional Devices In Their Academic Writing Tasks. African Journal of Applied Research, 11(5), 617–635. https://doi.org/10.26437/vja2j364
Panahova, L. (2025). Recognition of the EU’s Actorness in the Karabakh Peace Process by Azerbaijan. Problems of Post-Communism, 72(2), 188–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/10758216.2024.2380329
Prillinger, H. (2021). Writing an Argumentative Essay Like Sherlock Holmes: Teaching Essay Structure with the Detective Analogy. In English Language Education (Vol. 22, pp. 153–160). Springer Science and Business Media B.V. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79241-1_14
Toan, L. N. (2025). Enhancing Administrative Texts Through Cohesive Devices and Narrative Elements. Jurnal Arbitrer, 12(2), 210–226. https://doi.org/10.25077/ar.12.2.210-226.2025
Trüb, R., Möller, J., Lohmann, J., Jansen, T., & Keller, S. D. (2025). Judgment accuracy in primary school EFL writing assessment: Do text characteristics matter? Assessing Writing, 66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2025.100957
Vepreva, I. T., & Zhibing, Y. (2023). Axiosphere of Social Advertising Poster about Coronavirus in Russia and China. Nauchnyi Dialog, 12(2), 102–123. https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2023-12-2-102-123
Vincent, S. T. (2021). Towards personalised and document-level machine translation of dialogue. 137–147. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2021.eacl-srw.19
Zhou, H., Liu, X., Wu, J., Liao, C., & Zhao, S. (2025). Correction: The perceived COVID-19 pandemic risk and mental distress in China: the mediating role of interpersonal trust and the moderating role of social cohesion (Frontiers in Psychology, 2025, 16, 1651664, 10.3389/fpsyg . 2025.1651664). Frontiers in Psychology, 16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1714759
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Achmad Muchamad Kamil, Citra Rizky Lestari
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
The journal allow the authors to hold the copyright without restrictions and allow the authors to retain publishing rights without restrictions. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
The journal allows third parties (readers, researchers, and others) to share and adapt the material in line with the license. In addition, the material must be given appropriate credit, provided with a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. If authors remix, transform, or build upon the material, they must distribute their contributions under the same license as the original.
